First Impression: An over-simplified version of a classic novella that falls a little short of the original but has the foundations for discussions about personality types.
Coutesy of Netgalley I received a free copy of this book to review shotly after it was first published.
Originally written by Antoine de Saint-Exupéry, The Little Prince was published in 1943. Hailed as a notable work of fiction, the novella has gone on to inspire Corrine Delporte to write The Journey of the Little Prince in celebration of the 80th anniversary of the original piece of work. In this latest children’s picture book, the little prince finds himself bored on his own planet so decides to visit another, and another, and another. The reason for his multiple trips is a lack of appreciation for the people he comes across, spurring him to continue his journey.
This book was designed with 5–6-year-olds in mind. I thought some of the phrasing could have used simpler words for example ‘I command you…’ might have been replaced with ‘I am telling you,’ ‘amusing’ could have been swapped out for ‘funny,’ and ‘decisions’ could have been simplified to read ‘choices’ to list a few. These were terms that my 6-year-old was stumped by when reading along with me. I would, therefore, suggest that this is a book for the caregiver to sit and read with the child, especially given that the chance meetings the prince has are designed to teach the child lessons about power, beauty, wealth, and experience.
The lessons are great, but I cannot help thinking they are better suited to a slightly older audience. At the age of five, children arguably learn more through play. I felt that the discussion around the child’s leadership, ability to give and receive compliments, seeing wealth as anything but monetary and living what they learn in books, might be a little over their heads. On the flip side, it was touching to see that the book included original illustrations from Antoine de Saint-Exupéry. I would have preferred more text surrounding each visit so that the lessons were more targeted, and thus better suited to 8–10-year-olds. As a book in its own right, the story detracted from the original work by being overly simplified and for a different audience making it clear that the authorship had changed.
Quick Rating: ⭐⭐⭐ / G Rated
Have your say: What is your opinion on rewriting classics? The Papergirl Community looks forward to reading your responses in the comments below.
Disclaimer: Clicking on links may direct you to Papergirl branded products, or Papergirl endorsed items for which there is an affiliation. It will not affect your purchases or prices in any way, but it may mean that Papergirl earns a small commission from any successful sales.
Wondering what to review next, consider:
- Josie, Johnie and Rosie and the Ocean Rescue by Michael Panzner
- Bold & Brave by K. A. Cummins
- Tully The Tadpole (Who Never Became A Toad) by A. M. Rugirrello
Leave a Reply